The Work of the Change Manager

Change Impact Assessment

A change impact assessment is a structured analysis of what a change will alter, and for whom, made by comparing the current state with the future state. The assessment covers areas such as processes, systems, roles, skills, structure, location, behaviors and culture, group by group, and it shapes the plans for communication, training and support.

Quick facts

Type
Practice (analysis technique)
Origin
Change management and business analysis practice; often structured with the McKinsey 7-S framework
Used when
Once the future state is clear enough to compare, and again whenever the design changes
Related models
McKinsey 7-S framework, stakeholder analysis, readiness assessment
Exam relevance
APMG CM Foundation, The Work of the Change Manager (WM0201)

What is a change impact assessment in change management?

A change impact assessment answers one question in detail: what will be different, and for whom? It compares how work is done today with how it will be done after the change and records each difference for each group of people affected.

The result is not a financial forecast or a risk register. It is a people-centered picture showing where the change lands lightly and where it transforms someone's daily work. That picture is the evidence base for what a change manager plans next: who to involve, what to communicate, what training to design and where resistance is likely.

A change impact assessment therefore turns "this affects everyone" into a specific list of changes that can be planned for.

What areas should a change impact assessment cover?

A thorough assessment looks beyond the technology. Typical areas are:

  • Processes: which activities start, stop or change, and in what order.
  • Systems and tools: what people use to do the work.
  • Roles and job content: new tasks, removed tasks, changed responsibilities.
  • Skills and knowledge: what people must learn or will no longer use.
  • Structure: reporting lines, team boundaries, headcount.
  • Location and working patterns: where and when people work.
  • Behaviors: what people are expected to do differently day to day.
  • Culture: the values and norms the change relies on or challenges.

Behaviors and culture are the easiest to miss, yet they often decide whether the change sticks.

A change impact assessment that covers only systems and processes understates what people will actually experience.

How do you do a change impact assessment step by step?

  1. Describe the current and future states in enough detail to compare them.
  2. Identify the affected groups, defined by how the change touches them (for example, by role) rather than by department alone.
  3. Record each impact as a move from the current to the future state, for each group and each area.
  4. Rate the size of each impact on a simple scale and note when it will be felt.
  5. Check the findings with people from each group, who often spot what the project team missed.
  6. Turn the findings into actions for communication, training and support.
  7. Revisit the assessment as the design evolves.

Results are often summarized per group in an impact profile, whose headings vary by method.

A change impact assessment is therefore an iterative analysis, not a one-off form.

How does the McKinsey 7-S framework help scan for impacts?

The 7-S framework, described by Robert Waterman, Tom Peters and Julien Phillips, treats an organization as seven connected elements: strategy, structure, systems, shared values, style, staff and skills. Because the elements are interdependent, a change aimed at one of them usually moves others.

Used as a checklist, 7-S widens the view. At Harbourside Council, a new online permit system changes systems; the other elements show more:

  • Skills: officers need to handle cases digitally.
  • Staff: fewer counter roles, more back-office case work.
  • Structure: a new team to manage the online queue.
  • Style: managers supervise work they can no longer see at the counter.
  • Shared values: a move from face-to-face service toward self-service.

The McKinsey 7-S framework thus helps a change impact assessment find knock-on impacts.

Why assess impact group by group?

The same change lands differently on each group. At Brightwater Health, electronic prescribing affects four groups in very different ways:

GroupMain impact areaCurrent stateFuture state
Junior doctorsProcesses, systemsWrite paper drug chartsPrescribe on a terminal or tablet
Ward nursesBehaviors, skillsRead charts at the bedsideScan and record each dose electronically
PharmacistsRolesReview charts on ward roundsReview prescriptions remotely as they arrive
Ward clerksRolesFile and chase paper chartsTask largely removed

An organization-wide average would rate this change "medium" and hide that ward clerks lose part of their role.

A change impact assessment is therefore most useful when its findings are broken down by the people who will live with them.

What are common mistakes with change impact assessment?

  • Starting too late, after the design is fixed and nothing can be adjusted.
  • Assessing technology only, and missing roles, behaviors and culture.
  • Working without the people affected, so informal tasks go unrecorded.
  • Treating impact as resistance: a heavy impact does not mean people will oppose the change, and a light one does not mean they will welcome it.
  • Ignoring other changes hitting the same groups at the same time.

A change impact assessment avoids these mistakes when it starts early, involves the affected groups and is updated as the change takes shape.

Change impact assessment vs. stakeholder mapping: what is the difference?

Change impact assessmentStakeholder mapping
Question answeredWhat changes, and for whom?Who can influence the change, and how much do they care?
Typical dimensionsProcesses, systems, roles, skills, structure, behaviors, culturePower, interest, attitude, influence
Main outputA list of impacts, rated by size and timing, per groupA map that sets the level of engagement for each stakeholder
Used to planTraining, communication content, support, readinessEngagement approach and who to involve

The two analyses feed each other: impact assessment shows what the change does to people, while stakeholder mapping shows how to work with those who can shape it.

Exam focus

At Foundation level (WM0201) expect comprehension of what a change impact assessment is for, why it compares current and future states group by group, and how the McKinsey 7-S framework can be used to scan for impact areas. Impact profiles are also a named topic; learn the course text's format for them from the official study guide. A common trap confuses impact assessment with power–interest mapping or with adoption measurement.

Practise this syllabus area →

FAQ

What is the purpose of a change impact assessment?

A change impact assessment shows what a change will alter, and for which groups, by comparing current and future ways of working. Its findings drive the change plan: who needs which messages, what training to build, where extra support is needed and where resistance is likely.

What does a change impact assessment include?

A change impact assessment typically records, for each affected group, the changes to processes, systems, roles, skills, structure, location, behaviors and culture. Each impact is described as a move from the current to the future state and rated for size and timing.

When should you do a change impact assessment?

Start as soon as the future state is clear enough to compare with today, ideally while the design can still change. Then update it as the design evolves, because late decisions often create new impacts.

Who should be involved in a change impact assessment?

The change manager usually leads it with the project's designers, but people from each affected group should check the findings. They know the informal tasks and workarounds that rarely appear in design documents.

How does the 7-S framework relate to change impact assessment?

The McKinsey 7-S framework offers seven connected elements of an organization: strategy, structure, systems, shared values, style, staff and skills. Used as a checklist, it prompts the change manager to look for knock-on impacts when a change targets just one element.

Sources

Last reviewed

Go deeper

ADKAR® and Prosci® are registered trademarks of Prosci, Inc. APMG International™ and Change Management™ are trademarks of APMG International. CCMP™ is a trademark of the Association of Change Management Professionals (ACMP). MBTI® and Myers-Briggs® are trademarks of The Myers & Briggs Foundation. TKI® is a trademark of The Myers-Briggs Company. VARK® is a registered trademark of VARK IP Limited. Other names may be trademarks of their respective owners. This guide is independent and is not affiliated with, sponsored or endorsed by any of these organizations.